Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868426›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Tale of Two Evils: Iatrogenic Propagation of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Juan Enciso, Madeline Zipperer, Luke Casals, Daniela R Crousillat

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan EncisoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Madeline ZippererDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Luke CasalsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Daniela R CrousillatHeart and Vascular Institute, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, USA.
University of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-traumatic and non-iatrogenic intimal separation of the coronary arterial wall. While poorly understood, its mechanism confers higher prevalence in younger females, and it is responsible for 25% of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in women under 50 years of age. SCAD is primarily diagnosed via coronary angiography; however, intraluminal contrast injection and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are associated with an increased risk of propagation and extension of the dissection leading to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a 48-year-old female with multivessel SCAD and subsequent iatrogenic dissection following contrast injection requiring multiple PCI for medical treatment of refractory cardiac angina.

Indexed as

multivessel scadrecurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissectionscadscad and fmdscad managementspontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID37868426
PMCPMC10586876
OpenAlexW4386855800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.