Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868307›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

The nature and organization of satellite DNAs in

Osamah Alisawi, Katja R Richert-Pöggeler, J S Pat Heslop-Harrison, Trude Schwarzacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Osamah AlisawiDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
Katja R Richert-PöggelerJulius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.
J S Pat Heslop-HarrisonDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, Institute for Environmental Futures, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Trude SchwarzacherDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, Institute for Environmental Futures, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
University of Leicester · GBJulius Kühn-Institut · DEUniversity of Kufa · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The garden petunia, Methods: Raw reads from available genomic assemblies and survey sequences of Results: Seven repeat families, PSAT1, PSAT3, PSAT4, PSAT5 PSAT6, PSAT7 and PSAT8, shared high consensus sequence similarity and organisation between the four genomes. Additionally, many degenerate copies were present. FISH in Discussion: These results demonstrate that (i) repeat families occupy distinct niches within chromosomes, (ii) they differ in the copy number, cluster organization and homogenization events, and that (iii) the recent genome hybridization in breeding

Indexed as

fluorescent in situ hybridizationPetuniaRepeatExplorerrepetitive DNA sequencessatellitomesurvey genomic sequencestandemly repeated DNAtelomere associated sequences (TAS)

Identifiers

PMID37868307
PMCPMC10587573
OpenAlexW4387403655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.