Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868286›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023

Fluorescent ICG angiography in laparoscopic rectal resection - a randomized controlled trial. Preliminary report.

Tomasz Gach, Paweł Bogacki, Zofia Orzeszko, Beata Markowska, Jan M Krzak, Maciej Szura, Rafał Solecki, Mirosław Szura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Review
  11. FromIndian journal of surgical oncology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. AUGUR-AIM: Clinical validation of an artificial intelligence indocyanine green fluorescence angiography expert representer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomasz GachDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Paweł BogackiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Zofia OrzeszkoDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Beata MarkowskaDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Jan M KrzakDepartment of General Surgery, South Jutland Hospital, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Maciej SzuraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Rafał SoleckiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Mirosław SzuraDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLHospital South West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most dangerous complications after rectal surgery. It can cause systemic complications, reduce the quality of life and worsen the results of oncological treatment. One of the causes of anastomotic leak is insufficient blood supply to the anastomosis. Intraoperative infrared angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) is expected to improve the assessment of intestinal perfusion and thus prevent anastomotic leakage. Aim: To present the results of the use of ICG intraoperative angiography during rectal surgery in the prevention of anastomotic leakage. Material and methods: The study included 76 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Patients were randomized to 2 groups: Group I - 41 patients with ICG intraoperative angiography; and Group II - 35 patients without ICG imaging. Anastomotic leak, length of hospitalization, and complication rate were compared. Results: Group I patients received intravenous ICG before the anastomosis. Average time of intestinal wall contrasting was 42 s (22-65 s). Average ICG procedure time was 4 min (3.2% of total time of surgery). Three (7.3%) patients after angiography revealed intestinal ischemia requiring widened resection. No anastomotic leak was found post-operatively, and no side effects were observed after administration of ICG. In group II, 3 (8.6%) anastomotic leakages were diagnosed, 2 of which required reoperation. Conclusions: Intraoperative angiography with ICG in near-infrared light is a safe and effective method of assessing intestinal perfusion. ICG angiography may change the surgical plan and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. It is necessary to continue the study until the assumed number of patients is reached.

Indexed as

anastomosis perfusionanastomotic leakcolorectal resectionintraoperative indocyanine-green angiography

Identifiers

PMID37868286
PMCPMC10585458
OpenAlexW4384571124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.