Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868222›Full record

ArticleACS nanoscience Au2023

UTILE-Gen: Automated Image Analysis in Nanoscience Using Synthetic Dataset Generator and Deep Learning.

André Colliard-Granero, Jenia Jitsev, Michael H Eikerling, Kourosh Malek, Mohammad J Eslamibidgoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nanoscience Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

André Colliard-GraneroTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IEK-13), Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-3710
Jenia JitsevCentre for Advanced Simulation and Analytics (CASA), Simulation and Data Science Lab for Energy Materials (SDL-EM), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Michael H EikerlingTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IEK-13), Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-8948
Kourosh MalekTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IEK-13), Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-0813
Mohammad J EslamibidgoliTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IEK-13), Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-2993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents the development and implementation of a deep learning-based workflow for autonomous image analysis in nanoscience. A versatile, agnostic, and configurable tool was developed to generate instance-segmented imaging datasets of nanoparticles. The synthetic generator tool employs domain randomization to expand the image/mask pairs dataset for training supervised deep learning models. The approach eliminates tedious manual annotation and allows training of high-performance models for microscopy image analysis based on convolutional neural networks. We demonstrate how the expanded training set can significantly improve the performance of the classification and instance segmentation models for a variety of nanoparticle shapes, ranging from spherical-, cubic-, to rod-shaped nanoparticles. Finally, the trained models were deployed in a cloud-based analytics platform for the autonomous particle analysis of microscopy images.

Identifiers

PMID37868222
PMCPMC10588433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.