ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Outcomes After Double-Layer Repair Versus En Masse Repair for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of early exercise and immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of kinesiology tape for rotator cuff injuries: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Single-row suture repair combined with tension-reducing augmentation versus double-row suture bridge repair for medium-to-large u-shaped supraspinatus tears: a retrospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a preoperative CT-based body composition nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival after radical surgery in patients with gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Retinal assessment in 143 patients with white matter lesions: the potential of OCTA as an evaluation tool.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A Modified Arthroscopic Triple-row Repair Technique for L-shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delamination of rotator cuff tears during arthroscopic shoulder surgery has an incidence of 38% to 92%. Double-layer (DL) repair and en masse (EM) repair are most commonly used in this situation. Purpose: To compare the clinical results of the DL versus EM repair techniques for delaminated rotator cuff tears using a meta-analysis. Study Design: Systematic review; level of evidence, 3. Methods: We identified relevant studies comparing the clinical results of DL and EM repair for delaminated rotator cuff injuries in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases after the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The primary outcomes were the Constant score and retear rate. Additionally, we compared other postoperative shoulder functional scores, shoulder range of motion, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores between the 2 suture methods using a meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes. Results: Of the 197 studies initially identified, 6 studies were included in this analysis. There were significant differences in the Constant score (MD, 8.64 [95% CI, 4.47 to 12.8]; Conclusion: Results of this review and meta-analysis suggest that DL repair was more beneficial than EM repair in terms of the Constant score and shoulder external rotation in patients with delaminated rotator cuff injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.