Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868215›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023

Using Machine Learning to Predict Nonachievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Rafael Krasic Alaiti, Caio Sain Vallio, Jorge Henrique Assunção, Fernando Brandão de Andrade E Silva, Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto, Eduardo Angeli Malavolta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael Krasic AlaitiResearch, Technology, and Data Science Office, Grupo Superador, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Sain VallioHealth Innovation, Data Science, and MLOps, Semantix, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Henrique AssunçãoFaculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Brandão de Andrade E SilvaFaculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mauro Emilio Conforto GracitelliFaculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arnaldo Amado Ferreira NetoFaculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Angeli MalavoltaFaculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital do Coração · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although some evidence suggests that machine learning algorithms may outperform classical statistical methods in prognosis prediction for several orthopaedic surgeries, to our knowledge, no study has yet used machine learning to predict patient-reported outcome measures after rotator cuff repair. Purpose: To determine whether machine learning algorithms using preoperative data can predict the nonachievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of disability at 2 years after rotator cuff surgical repair with a similar performance to that of other machine learning studies in the orthopaedic surgery literature. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We evaluated 474 patients (n = 500 shoulders) with rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2013 and April 2019. The study outcome was the difference between the preoperative and 24-month postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. A cutoff score was calculated based on the established MCID of 15.2 points to separate success (higher than the cutoff) from failure (lower than the cutoff). Routinely collected imaging, clinical, and demographic data were used to train 8 machine learning algorithms (random forest classifier; light gradient boosting machine [LightGBM]; decision tree classifier; extra trees classifier; logistic regression; extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]; Results: The AUCs for all algorithms ranged from 0.58 to 0.68. The random forest classifier and LightGBM presented the highest AUC values (0.68 [95% CI, 0.48-0.79] and 0.67 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75], respectively) of the 8 machine learning algorithms. Most of the machine learning algorithms outperformed logistic regression (AUC, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.81]); nonetheless, their performance was lower than that of other machine learning studies in the orthopaedic surgery literature. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms demonstrated some ability to predict the nonachievement of the MCID on the ASES 2 years after rotator cuff repair surgery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningrotator cuff repairrotator cuff tearsshoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID37868215
PMCPMC10588422
OpenAlexW4387773724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.