ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2023
The Influence of Body Mass Index on Radiation Dose and Exposure Time in Fluoroscopic Guided Hip Injections - A Comparative Analysis of Two Approaches.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anterolateral hip injection approach under portable ultrasound guidance: a prospective randomized controlled trial versus conventional ultrasound.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Intra-articular hip injections (IHI) are routinely performed for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The procedure can be performed via either an anterior or a lateral approach with fluoroscopic guidance being widely practised. There is a risk of radiation exposure associated with fluoroscopy assisted IHI. This may be influenced either by the surgical approach or the patient's body mass index (BMI) or both. This study was undertaken to compare the relationships of the respective approaches to BMI, fluoroscopic exposure time (FET) and radiation dose (RD). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted comprising 74 patients who underwent IHI with 37 patients in each group (anterior and lateral). Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post operatively for any complications. The intra-operative radiation dose, fluoroscopic exposure time and BMI data were collected and analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients in anterior and lateral groups was 61.18±14.08 and 67.21±14.39 years respectively. No complications were noted in either group. However, there was a significant increase in FET (P=0.002) and RD (P<0.001) in patients with BMI ≥ 30. In the lateral group, this trend was markedly noted with increase in FET (P<0.001) and RD (P<0.001) in patients with BMI ≥ 30. On the other hand, in the anterior group there was no statistically significant increase in FET (P=0.155) and only a moderate increase in RD (P=0.020) in patients with BMI ≥ 30. Conclusion: Both anterior and lateral approaches to fluoroscopic guided IHI are equally safe in terms of complications involved. There is statistically significant increase in both radiation dose and fluoroscopic exposure time in patients with BMI ≥ 30. This is more pronounced in lateral approach. The anterior approach is most effective in reducing both radiation dose and fluoroscopic exposure time, more so in patients with BMI of 30 and above.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.