Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868127›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study.

Hari Magge, Esther Lee, Timothy B Shaver, Punam G Thakkar, Ameet Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hari MaggeDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7533-816X
Esther LeeDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Timothy B ShaverDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Punam G ThakkarDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Ameet SinghDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The microdebrider is a powered surgical instrument that is widely used in the field of otolaryngology. We aim to identify the type and frequency of device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to the use of microdebriders. Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Setting: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2011 to 2021 Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods: The MAUDE database was queried for reports of "microdebrider," with adverse events selected that pertained to usage in head and neck surgeries from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. Results: There were 282 adverse events in 267 individual medical device reports (MDR). Although the majority of the reports did not specify the specific operation, endoscopic sinus surgery was the most common reported procedure (89, 33.3%). The most common cause of device malfunction was due to a broken piece (120, 48.2%) followed by overheating of the microdebrider motor (78, 31.3%). Of the reports which specified patient injury, the most commonly reported was "unintentional tissue damage," (10, 32.3%). Conclusion: The microdebrider has demonstrated utility within the field of otolaryngology, but is not without risk of malfunction that can cause patient injury. By understanding possible risks of microdebrider usage, including tissue damage, burns, and bleeds caused by device malfunction or operator error, physicians can be better prepared to address complications and educate patients.

Indexed as

adverse eventsendoscopic sinus surgeryMAUDEmicrodebriderpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID37868127
PMCPMC10586755
OpenAlexW4387784207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.