Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868111›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2023

A new pathway for penicillin delabeling in Norway.

Marie Bjørbak Alnæs, Oddvar Oppegaard, Bård Reiakvam Kittang, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Anine Bernhoft Langeland, Brita Skodvin, Tormod Bjånes, Torgeir Storaas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05090527 (Penicillin Delabeling With Help of a Risk Stratification Tool, Advanced Provocation Tests in a Non Allergologic Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05090527 nacompletednot on this map

Penicillin Delabeling With Help of a Risk Stratification Tool, Advanced Provocation Tests in a Non Allergologic Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled153ConditionsPenicillin AllergyArmsRisk stratification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie Bjørbak AlnæsSection of Clinical Allergy, Department of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Oddvar OppegaardDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Bård Reiakvam KittangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Stein Håkon Låstad LygreSection of Clinical Allergy, Department of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Anine Bernhoft LangelandDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Brita SkodvinThe Norwegian Advisory Unit for Antibiotic Use in Hospitals, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Tormod BjånesDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology (MBF) Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Torgeir StoraasSection of Clinical Allergy, Department of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5020 Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Penicillin allergy is self-reported by 3-10% of patients admitted to hospital. The label is wrong in 90% of the cases and has severe health implications. Penicillin-delabeling can reverse the negative effects of the label, and pathways adapted to local practice are needed. No tools are available in Norway for penicillin delabeling outside an allergy clinic. Objective: To create and validate the first penicillin delabeling pathway applicable outside an allergy clinic in Norway. Methods: An interdisciplinary taskforce created a penicillin allergy delabeling program (PAD) adapted to the Norwegian health care system. This was validated in a prospective, single-center study. Very low-risk and low-risk patients underwent a direct oral penicillin challenge and high-risk patients were referred for allergologic evaluation. Results: One-hundred forty-nine patients declaring penicillin allergy were included. Seventy-four (50%) were very-low- and low risk patients suitable for a direct oral penicillin challenge resulting in only 1 mild reaction. Sixty high-risk patients were eligible for an oral penicillin challenge after allergologic evaluation; 3 patients reacted non-severely. Conclusion: We have created and demonstrated feasibility of the first penicillin delabeling program (PAD) applicable in a hospital setting outside an allergy clinic in Norway. Our data suggest this is safe and beneficial, with 49% patients delabeled through a direct oral penicillin challenge, performed without any serious adverse events, and an overall 87% delabeling rate.

Indexed as

Critical pathwayDrug hypersensitivityPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID37868111
PMCPMC10587752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.