ArticleEJIFCC2023
Inter-laboratory method validation of CD34+ flow-cytometry assay: the experience of Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre.
Article in EJIFCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Changes of Immunoreactive CD34, CD117, and CD41 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Human Placentas of Different Gestational Ages.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Article
- Closed-system manufacturing of therapeutic NK cells using automated cell enrichment and concentration processes enables scalable, robust and cost-effective solutions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre (CIC 305) includes four flow-cytometry laboratories assessing quality control on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with different instruments and operators. Therefore, the CD34+ enumeration assay should be validated on a regular basis. We describe here the validation plan to test the inter-laboratory reproducibility of CD34+ enumeration assay, based on the risk analysis. Stabilized blood samples were analysed using Stem-Kit reagent according to manufacturer's instructions and acquired using the Beckman Coulter Navios at Regina Margherita Children's' Hospital (305-1), Beckman Coulter FC500 at Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (305-2), BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ at S. Luigi Hospital (305-3), and Beckman Coulter Navios EX at Mauriziano Hospital (305-4). The ISHAGE guidelines were followed for estimating % and absolute number of CD34+ cells in single-platform method. For each sample repeatability limit (r), reproducibility error, uncertainty of reproducibility error and coefficient of variation (CV) were reported. The repeated measurements from each laboratory or instrument have a variability, expressed as reproducibility error, lower than the repeatability limit for that single parameter. The corrected reproducibility error is always lower than the repeatability limit except for the percentage value of the "low" count. The analysis of inter-laboratory variance is within the maximum acceptable variance value, and the CV of all measurements for each parameter is less than 8%, indicating low measurement variability among laboratories. Evaluating the overall data, we can conclude that the four laboratories are perfectly aligned and the results are reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37868085PMC10588076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.