Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868074›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2023

Virtues in Competency-Based Assessment Frameworks: A Text Analysis.

Pleuntje M B Verstegen, J J Jos Kole, A Stef Groenewoud, Frank J A van den Hoogen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Valuing virtue in medicine: a closer look at CanMEDS.Canadian medical education journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Virtue ethics, the next step in quality improvement?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pleuntje M B VerstegenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-3888
J J Jos KoleRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A Stef GroenewoudRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5919-4856
Frank J A van den HoogenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-5599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Official documentation of specialty training provides comprehensive and elaborate criteria to assess residents. These criteria are commonly described in terms of competency roles and entrustable professional activities (EPA's), but they may also Method: We applied a two-staged Results: Thirty virtues were identified in the ENT- training program. Amongst them, practical wisdom, temperance, and commitment. Furthermore, integrity, curiosity, flexibility, attentiveness, trustworthiness and calmness are often implicitly assumed. Notable findings are the emphasis on efficiency and effectiveness. Together, these virtues depict an ideal of a future medical specialist. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that competency-frameworks and EPA's implicitly appeal to virtues and articulate a specific ideal surgeon. Explicit attention for virtue development and discussion of the role and relevance of implied ideal professionals in terms of virtues could further improve specialty training.

Indexed as

MedicineSurgeonsHumansMoralsVirtues

Identifiers

PMID37868074
PMCPMC10588518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.