ReviewCell genomics2023
Equity, diversity, and inclusion at the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health.
Review in Cell genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- "There's no representation": a qualitative study of attitudes and motivations towards genomic research participation among Australian South Asians.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Translating multi-omics into healthcare: requisites for scalable and equitable implementation.Human genomics · 2026Review
- From Bench to Bedside: Ethical and Clinical Best Practices for Genome Editing Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From the brain cell atlas to precision neurology: a review of the application of AI-driven multi-omics in brain science.GigaScience · 2026Review
- Charting exposomethics: a roadmap for the ethical foundations of the human exposome project.Human genomics · 2026Review
- Co-creating an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) Strategy in a Pan-Canadian Health Data Research Network.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
- The ethical aspects of human organ-on-chip models: A mapping review.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- A computational medicine framework integrating multi-omics, systems biology, and artificial neural networks for Alzheimer's disease therapeutic discovery.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
- Achieving inclusive healthcare through integrating education and research with AI and personalized curricula.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in Australia.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Genomics and multiomics in the age of precision medicine.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- A call to action to scale up research and clinical genomic data sharing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Bridging genomics' greatest challenge: The diversity gap.Cell genomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A lack of diversity in genomics for health continues to hinder equitable leadership and access to precision medicine approaches for underrepresented populations. To avoid perpetuating biases within the genomics workforce and genomic data collection practices, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) must be addressed. This paper documents the journey taken by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (a genomics-based standard-setting and policy-framing organization) to create a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive environment for its standards and members. Initial steps include the creation of two groups: the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Advisory Group and the Regulatory and Ethics Diversity Group. Following a framework that we call "Reflected in our Teams, Reflected in our Standards," both groups address EDI at different stages in their policy development process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.