Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868039›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2023

Learning functional conservation between human and pig to decipher evolutionary mechanisms underlying gene expression and complex traits.

Jinghui Li, Tianjing Zhao, Dailu Guan, Zhangyuan Pan, Zhonghao Bai, Jinyan Teng, Zhe Zhang, Zhili Zheng, Jian Zeng, Huaijun Zhou and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jinghui LiDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Tianjing ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Dailu GuanDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Zhangyuan PanDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Zhonghao BaiCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Jinyan TengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhe ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhili ZhengInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jian ZengInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Huaijun ZhouDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Lingzhao FangCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USAarhus University · DKSouth China Agricultural University · CNBroad Institute · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of genomic conservation between humans and pigs at the functional level can improve the potential of pigs as a human biomedical model. To address this, we developed a deep learning-based approach to learn the genomic conservation at the functional level (DeepGCF) between species by integrating 386 and 374 functional profiles from humans and pigs, respectively. DeepGCF demonstrated better prediction performance compared with the previous method. In addition, the resulting DeepGCF score captures the functional conservation between humans and pigs by examining chromatin states, sequence ontologies, and regulatory variants. We identified a core set of genomic regions as functionally conserved that plays key roles in gene regulation and is enriched for the heritability of complex traits and diseases in humans. Our results highlight the importance of cross-species functional comparison in illustrating the genetic and evolutionary basis of complex phenotypes.

Indexed as

complex traitdeep learningfunctional conservationgene expressionhumanpig

Identifiers

PMID37868039
PMCPMC10589632
OpenAlexW4386176277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.