Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37868028›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2023

Safety Summary of the Selective Cytopheretic Device: A Review of Safety Data Across Multiple Clinical Trials in ICU Patients With Acute Kidney Injury and Multiple Organ Failure.

H David Humes, Stuart L Goldstein, Lenar T Yessayan, David A Catanzaro, Emily C Scribe, Sai Prasad N Iyer, Kevin K Chung

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H David HumesDepartment of Nephrology, Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Stuart L GoldsteinCenter for Acute Care Nephrology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.
Lenar T YessayanDepartment of Nephrology, Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
David A CatanzaroSeaStar Medical; Denver, CO.
Emily C ScribeSeaStar Medical; Denver, CO.
Sai Prasad N IyerSeaStar Medical; Denver, CO.
Kevin K ChungSeaStar Medical; Denver, CO.
Denver School of Nursing · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAcute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy is a significant complication in ICU patients with mortality rates exceeding 50%. A dysregulated immune response can lead to systemic inflammation caused by hyperactivity of pro-inflammatory neutrophils and monocytes leading to tissue damage. The selective cytopheretic device (SCD) is an investigational medical device in a new class of cell-directed extracorporeal therapies distinct from cytokine adsorbers or filters, as it targets activated leukocytes. These leukocytes are the cellular sources driving this hyperinflammatory process. The objective of this report is to summarize the safety experience from clinical studies of the SCD in ICU patients with AKI or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction (MOD). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: The studies included in this report represent all relevant trials of the SCD conducted in patients with AKI or ARDS and MOD. Adverse event data, clinical laboratory data and mortality rates were described and summarized in this report. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Five clinical studies were included in this report, including four adult studies of AKI and/or ARDS and one pediatric AKI study, which involved 151 patients treated with the SCD in an ICU setting. Over 800 SCD sessions were deployed with an estimated 19,000 exposure hours with no device-related infections or attributable serious adverse events. Furthermore, there were no safety signals of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or other indications of immunodepletion or immunosuppression.

conclusionsThe SCD has shown to be a promising extracorporeal therapy with promising clinical results and a favorable safety profile. These studies support that the SCD can be added as a therapeutic intervention in critically ill AKI patient populations with multiple organ failure without adding additional safety risks.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryimmunomodulationmonocytesmultiple organ failureneutrophils

Identifiers

PMID37868028
PMCPMC10589552
OpenAlexW4387784154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.