ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023
Describing the Patient Journey of Women with Claims for Uterine Fibroids and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Using a Commercial Database (2011-2020).
Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Utilization after Uterine Fibroid Diagnosis by Race and Ethnicity.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2026Article
- Integrated pharmacoanalysis, bioinformatics analysis, and experimental validation to identify the ingredients and mechanisms of Xiao-Luo-Wan in uterine fibroids treatment.Pharmaceutical biology · 2025Article
- Patterns and Outcomes in the Management of Uterine Fibroids: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- The integrative health status of women with uterine fibroids wishing to maintain fertility: a cross-sectional study based on Levine's conservation model.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- The Burden of Pain Symptoms in Individuals with Uterine Fibroids-Results from a Prospective Observational Study in the USA.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This retrospective database claims analysis describes the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of commercially insured United States women with uterine fibroids (UF) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Methods: Women age 18-55 years with an incident UF diagnosis (index date) between 1/1/2012 and 12/31/2019 and ≥1 claim for HMB (UF-HMB), were identified from the Optum Results: A total of 85,428 women had UF-HMB (mean [SD] age, 43.7 [6.4] years). The median follow-up was 3.2 years. After HMB, the most common symptoms were pelvic pressure/pain (27.6%) and backache (17.5%). Within 6 months of UF diagnosis, 40.2% of patients had received only pharmacologic therapy; 25.5% had received no treatment; 24.3% had a hysterectomy, and 10.0% had other procedures. By the end of follow-up, 50.0% had received a hysterectomy. Multiple factors were predictive of a higher likelihood of receiving hormonal therapy (geographic region, infertility, pre-index pregnancy) or hysterectomy (older age, prior hormonal treatment, specific bulk symptoms, White race). Conclusion: Within 6 months of UF diagnosis, fewer than one-half of women with UF-HMB had received hormonal therapy, one-quarter received no treatment, and one-quarter had received a hysterectomy or another gynecologic procedure. Patients who received a hysterectomy were more likely to be older, White, and to have bulk symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.