Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867901›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

The impact of national culture in the development of complexity reasoning skills: An international comparison.

Guillermo Rodríguez-Abitia, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, Sandra Martínez-Pérez, Edgar Omar López-Caudana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillermo Rodríguez-AbitiaRaymond A. Mason School of Business, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
María Soledad Ramírez-MontoyaInstitute for the Future of Education, School of Humanities and Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Sandra Martínez-PérezFaculty of Education Sciences, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Edgar Omar López-CaudanaInstitute for the Future of Education, School of Humanities and Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a clear inequality in gender distribution for the STEM areas (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Furthermore, there is a noticeable lack of diversity and a socio-economic gap that requires actionable solutions. To explore potential factors that affect the participation of women in STEM, this paper reviews two possible groups of determinants: national culture and complexity thinking. A survey with 684 respondents from higher education institutions in Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Spain was undertaken. The instrument measured four components of complexity thinking namely critical, scientific, innovative, and systemic). Using analysis of variance between two groups and between multiple groups, differences were observed between the countries' samples and between genders. Once the significance was confirmed, boxplots for each dimension were elaborated to facilitate the visualization of the distributions. The scores were compared with the national culture values to seek possible behavioral patterns in the data. The results reveal two groups between the observed countries. Also, there are clear indications of a relationship between the national culture dimensions and the complex thinking components.

Indexed as

complex thinkingDiversity gapEducational innovationHigher educationNational cultureSTEM

Identifiers

PMID37867901
PMCPMC10585377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.