Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867787›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Development of a population-level prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality in older adults: A population-based cohort study.

Sikandar H Khan, Anthony J Perkins, Mikita Fuchita, Emma Holler, Damaris Ortiz, Malaz Boustani, Babar A Khan, Sujuan Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the Adequacy of a Prediction Model.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sikandar H KhanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care Sleep and Occupational Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-3436
Anthony J PerkinsDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Mikita FuchitaDepartment of Anesthesiology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.
Emma HollerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Indiana University School of Public Health Bloomington Indiana USA.
Damaris OrtizDepartment of Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Malaz BoustaniCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Babar A KhanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care Sleep and Occupational Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Sujuan GaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineRegenstrief Institute · USIndiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI LAHIRI, DEBOMOY K · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072976 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ANDREW J SAYKIN · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
Digital Detection of Dementia Studies (D cubed Studies).R01AG069765 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BEN-MILED, ZINA, BOUSTANI, MALAZ · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
Decreasing Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias after Delirium-Exercise and Cognitive Training (DDD-ECT)R01AG055391 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KHAN, BABAR A · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Mobile Critical Care Recovery Program (m-CCRP) for Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) SurvivorsR01HL131730 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KHAN, BABAR A · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Indiana University Dementia Screening Trial: The IU CHOICE StudyR01AG040220 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BOUSTANI, MALAZ · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Reactive Oxygen Species in Respiratory Failure, Delirium, and Post-ICU Cognitive ImpairmentK76AG074925 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sikandar Hayat Khan · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
Anesthesiology Mentored Research TrainingT32GM135169 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Susan L Ingram, Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic · 2021 to 2026
$1.0M
Academic Leadership Award for Statistical Training in Multidisciplinary Aging ResearchK07AG076659 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SUJUAN GAO · 2022 to 2026
$777k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131730NIA NIH HHS K07 AG076659NIA NIH HHS K76 AG074925NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040220NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055391NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069765NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Given the growing utilization of critical care services by an aging population, development of population-level risk models which predict intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality may offer advantages for researchers and health systems. Our objective was to develop a risk model for ICU survivorship and mortality among community dwelling older adults. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of 48,127 patients who were 50 years and older with at least one primary care visit between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify variables predictive of ICU survivorship. Results: ICU admission and mortality within 2 years after index primary care visit date were used to divide patients into three groups of "alive without ICU admission", "ICU survivors," and "death." Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify EHR predictive variables for the three patient outcomes. Cross-validation by randomly splitting the data into derivation and validation data sets (60:40 split) was used to identify predictor variables and validate model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) curve. In our overall sample, 92.2% of patients were alive without ICU admission, 6.2% were admitted to the ICU at least once and survived, and 1.6% died. Greater deciles of age over 50 years, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder or chronic heart failure, and laboratory abnormalities in alkaline phosphatase, hematocrit, and albumin contributed highest risk score weights for mortality. Risk scores derived from the model discriminated between patients that died versus remained alive without ICU admission (AUC = 0.858), and between ICU survivors versus alive without ICU admission (AUC = 0.765). Conclusion: Our risk scores provide a feasible and scalable tool for researchers and health systems to identify patient cohorts at increased risk for ICU admission and survivorship. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate the risk scores in other patient populations.

Indexed as

critical care outcomesmortalitypopulation healthrisk

Identifiers

PMID37867787
PMCPMC10587446
OpenAlexW4387824255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.