Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867666›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Conjugated Nanoparticles for Solid Tumor Theranostics: Unraveling the Interplay of Known and Unknown Factors.

Vivek P Chavda, Pankti C Balar, Lakshmi Vineela Nalla, Rajashri Bezbaruah, Niva Rani Gogoi, Siva Nageswara Rao Gajula, Berney Peng, Avtar S Meena, João Conde, Rajendra Prasad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Vivek P ChavdaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380001, India.
Pankti C BalarPharmacy Section, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380001, India.
Lakshmi Vineela NallaDepartment of Pharmacy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh 522302, India.
Rajashri BezbaruahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Dibrugarh, 786004 Assam, India.
Niva Rani GogoiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Dibrugarh, 786004 Assam, India.
Siva Nageswara Rao GajulaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, GITAM School of Pharmacy, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530045, India.
Berney PengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
Avtar S MeenaDepartment of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
João CondeToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa 1169-056, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-6792
Rajendra PrasadSchool of Biochemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-8630
B.J. Medical College · INDibrugarh University · INDepartment of Biotechnology · INGITAM University · INIndian Institute of Technology BHU · INKoneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation · INUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer diagnoses have been increasing worldwide, and solid tumors are among the leading contributors to patient mortality, creating an enormous burden on the global healthcare system. Cancer is responsible for around 10.3 million deaths worldwide. Solid tumors are one of the most prevalent cancers observed in recent times. On the other hand, early diagnosis is a significant challenge that could save a person's life. Treatment with existing methods has pitfalls that limit the successful elimination of the disorder. Though nanoparticle-based imaging and therapeutics have shown a significant impact in healthcare, current methodologies for solid tumor treatment are insufficient. There are multiple complications associated with the diagnosis and management of solid tumors as well. Recently, surface-conjugated nanoparticles such as lipid nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles, and quantum dots have shown positive results in solid tumor diagnostics and therapeutics in preclinical models. Other nanotheranostic material platforms such as plasmonic theranostics, magnetotheranostics, hybrid nanotheranostics, and graphene theranostics have also been explored. These nanoparticle theranostics ensure the appropriate targeting of tumors along with selective delivery of cargos (both imaging and therapeutic probes) without affecting the surrounding healthy tissues. Though they have multiple applications, nanoparticles still possess numerous limitations that need to be addressed in order to be fully utilized in the clinic. In this review, we outline the importance of materials and design strategies used to engineer nanoparticles in the treatment and diagnosis of solid tumors and how effectively each method overcomes the drawbacks of the current techniques. We also highlight the gaps in each material platform and how design considerations can address their limitations in future research directions.

Identifiers

PMID37867666
PMCPMC10586263
OpenAlexW4387361864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.