Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867607›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2023

Delay to Surgical Treatment in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients.

Elias G Joseph, Jordan Serotte, Mohammad N Haider, Sonja Pavlesen, Mark Anders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Does early surgery within 48 hours improve clinical outcomes in elderly hip fractures? A matched cohort study of 1776 hip fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Frailty as a determinant of mortality, surgical timing and hospital stay in proximal femur fractures: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultra-early versus early surgery for hip fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elias G JosephDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-2381
Jordan SerotteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3975-441X
Mohammad N HaiderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sonja PavlesenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Mark AndersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hip fractures in the geriatric population are frequently encountered. There is increasing focus on minimizing the delay to surgery in these patients. This study was designed to evaluate factors responsible for a delay to surgery in a geriatric hip fracture population and how time to surgery affects mortality. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients sustaining low energy geriatric hip fractures in either an American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified Level 1 trauma center or a local university affiliated community teaching hospital were reviewed. The following variables were evaluated as independent risk factors for delay to surgery: demographic data, surgical details, use of cardiology resources, treatment center, and comorbidities. As a secondary objective, the effect of time to surgery on 1 year mortality was analyzed. Results: 1157 patients met inclusion criteria. The following factors increased the risk of delay to surgery greater than 48 hours: male sex, treatment in a community hospital (versus trauma center), older age, multiple comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular-related conditions or other fractures), cardiology consultation, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of 3 or 4. Cardiology consultation was the strongest independent predictor of risk for delay to surgery of >48 hours (odds ratio, 6.68; 95% confidence interval, 4.40 to 10.14; Conclusion: The presence of cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiology consultations can delay surgical treatments for hip fractures in patients greater than 65 years old, but the delay did not influence 1-year all-cause mortality. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

cardiologydelay to surgeryfragility fracturesgeriatric medicinehip fracturemortality

Identifiers

PMID37867607
PMCPMC10588415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.