Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867487›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2023

Management of epilepsy in pregnancy: What we still need to learn.

Torbjörn Tomson, Leihao Sha, Lei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Torbjörn TomsonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Leihao ShaDepartment of Neurology, Joint Research Institution of Altitude Health, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan.
Lei ChenDepartment of Neurology, Joint Research Institution of Altitude Health, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan.
Sichuan University · CNKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe pregnancies have been a major concern for women with epilepsy. With more than 50 years of research, we have learned that antiseizure medications (ASMs) differ in their teratogenic risk. Valproate is associated with greater risks for malformations and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes than other ASMs. Furthermore, seizure control is important for maternal health in pregnancy and it can be affected by a decline in serum concentrations of many ASMs during pregnancy. However, significant knowledge gaps remain. First, there is insufficient evidence about the relative teratogenic risks of most newer generation ASMs, as well as diverse ASM combinations. Similarly, information on gestation-induced changes in maternal serum levels and transfer into breastmilk is inadequate for the majority of the newer ASMs. Further, the optimal dose of folate supplementation remains unknown for women with epilepsy. Finally, most of previous studies on epilepsy and pregnancy come from Europe or North America. Efforts should be made to include more countries in collaboration with existing prospective epilepsy and pregnancy studies to increase the cohort size while at the same time enhancing the generalizability of the results. Large countries, such as China, present great potential to shorten the time to obtain answers to important unsolved questions.

Indexed as

Antiseizure medicationSafe pregnancyTeratogenic riskWomen with epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID37867487
PMCPMC10585340
OpenAlexW4387378734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.