Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867466›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2023

Multimodal Imaging of Reticular Pseudodrusen in Turkish Patients.

Serap Bilge Çeper, Filiz Afrashi, Cumali Değirmenci, Jale Menteş, Serhad Nalçacı, Cezmi Akkın

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serap Bilge ÇeperMalatya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of of Ophthalmology, Malatya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-0170
Filiz AfrashiEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-1600
Cumali DeğirmenciEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-536X
Jale MenteşEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-2290
Serhad NalçacıEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-9344
Cezmi AkkınEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-9599
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the presence and prevalence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) in patients with age-related macular degeneration using multiple imaging modalities and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these modalities in the detection of RPD. Materials and Methods: Images from a total of 198 consecutive patients were analyzed prospectively. Color fundus photography, red-free imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), infrared and blue reflectance (BR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography were performed. RPD was diagnosed in the presence of relevant findings in at least two of the imaging methods used. Results: RPD were detected in 149 eyes (37.6%). In the detection of RPD, color fundus photography, red-free photography, SD-OCT, infrared, FAF, BR, and FFA imaging had sensitivity values of 50%, 57.7%, 91.6%, 95%, 74.6%, 65.7%, and 28.2% and specificity values of 99.6%, 100%, 98.4%, 94.6%, 100%, 99.6%, and 69.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Infrared imaging had the highest sensitivity. SD-OCT combined with infrared imaging was the most sensitive imaging technique for detecting RPD. The high specificity of FAF, red-free, and BR imaging may be useful to confirm a diagnosis of RPD.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationRetinal DrusenFluorescein AngiographyHumansMultimodal ImagingOphthalmoscopyAge-related macular degenerationimaging methodsreticular pseudodrusenTurkish patients

Identifiers

PMID37867466
PMCPMC10599339
OpenAlexW4387773924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.