Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867420›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia open2024

Long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients from the Asia-Pacific region with refractory focal-onset seizures in Study 335 open-label extension.

Takuji Nishida, Sang Kun Lee, Yushi Inoue, Kazunori Saeki, Kohei Ishikawa, Manoj Malhotra, Anna Patten, Sunao Kaneko

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01618695 (A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01618695 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel (E2007) Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial-onset Seizures

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Co., Ltd.Ran2012 to 2020Enrolled940ConditionsPartial-onset SeizuresArmsPerampanel, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Takuji NishidaNational Epilepsy Center, NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.
Sang Kun LeeSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-0699
Yushi InoueNational Epilepsy Center, NHO Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kazunori SaekiEisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei IshikawaEisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Manoj MalhotraHarlem Hospital, Lenox Ave, New York, USA.
Anna PattenEisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Sunao KanekoNorth Tohoku Epilepsy Center, Minato Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Eisai (Japan) · JPNational Epilepsy Center · JPEisai (United Kingdom) · GBHarlem Hospital Center · USSapporo Toho Hospital · JPSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Eisai Co., Ltd. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel for the treatment of patients with refractory focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), from the Asia-Pacific region.

methodsStudy 335 (NCT01618695) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study. Patients aged ≥12 years with refractory FOS who completed the Core Study could enter an open-label extension (OLEx) Phase (6-week Conversion and ≥46-week Maintenance Period). Endpoints included median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% responder and seizure-freedom rates, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

resultsThe Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set included 704 patients (529 received perampanel and 175 received placebo during the Core Study; all patients received perampanel during OLEx). The median percent reduction in seizure frequency and 50% responder rates in patients who received perampanel during the Core Study were maintained throughout the OLEx Phase (Week 64-75: 55.9% and 54.3%, respectively). Seizure freedom for ≥12 consecutive months at any time during perampanel treatment was achieved by 4.1% of patients with FOS and 14.2% of patients with FBTCS. Among patients treated with perampanel 4 mg/day (n = 83), median reduction in seizure frequency was lower in those who received concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications (EIASMs) than those who received non-EIASMs. The most common TEAE was dizziness (n = 318; 46.8%); 141 (20.8%) patients had TEAEs that led to study/drug withdrawal. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, long-term seizure control was achieved with adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory FOS, with or without FBTCS, in an Asia-Pacific population.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsNitrilesPyridonesSeizuresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsiaChildDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesadjunctiveanti‐seizure medicationsfocal‐onset seizuresperampanelrefractory

Identifiers

PMID37867420
PMCPMC10984284
OpenAlexW4387865499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.