Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37867185›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Qualitative and Economic Impact of Standardized and Digitalized Operation Room Processes in Obesity Surgery.

Christian von Schudnat, Dirk Weyhe, Blanca de Miguel Molina, Klaus-Peter Schoeneberg, Jose Albors-Garrigos, Benjamin Lahmann, Alexandra Selzer, Ralf Weise

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 68% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian von SchudnatDepartment of Business Organization, Faculty of Business Management, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Cami de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. Cvonschudnat@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-3312
Dirk WeyheDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Medical Campus of the University of Oldenburg, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
Blanca de Miguel MolinaFaculty of Business Administration and Management, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Cami de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Klaus-Peter SchoenebergDepartment of Economic and Social Sciences, Berliner Hochschule für Technik, Luxemburger Str. 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Jose Albors-GarrigosDepartment of Business Organization, Faculty of Business Management, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Cami de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Benjamin LahmannJohnson & Johnson MedTech GmbH, Robert-Koch-Str. 1, 22851, Norderstedt, Germany.
Alexandra SelzerDepartment of Economic and Social Sciences, Berliner Hochschule für Technik, Luxemburger Str. 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf WeiseDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Marien-Hospital Friesoythe gGmbH, St.-Marien-Str. 1, 26169, Friesoythe, Germany.
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESBerliner Hochschule für Technik · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEJohnson & Johnson (Germany) · DESt. Marien Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe introduction of innovative digital solutions in healthcare lags compared to other industries but promises high potential to create value in efficiency and quality. Increasing economic pressure forces hospitals to optimize operating room (OR) processes, in which such solutions might provide additional support. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective case-control and monocentric study investigated if digitalized and standardized intraoperative surgical workflows of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) have a significant impact on efficiency, quality, and economics. Logistic and linear regression models were used to apply propensity score matching (PSM) for efficiency and odds ratio for the quality analysis.

resultsThe study included 49 patients per group. The results demonstrate a significant increase in efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the treatment group. Length of stay (LoS) was 1.2 days less than in the control group (5.6 vs. 4.4). The mean of total OR and skin-to-skin time increased by 3.7% (142.00 vs. 136.80) and 8.5%, respectively (93.88 vs. 85.94). The standard deviation (SD) of total OR and skin-to-skin time decreased by 7.36 min (26.86 vs. 34.22) and 8.98 min (23.20 vs. 32.18) in the treatment group. The results of the odds ratio did not provide any conclusions on quality. Overall, costs were reduced by 318 € per patient and total revenue improved by 10,073 €.

conclusionThe implementation of digital workflow management systems in obesity surgery improves economic efficiency. Hospital management and payors should evaluate further support in research of the digitization of the OR, followed by reimbursement to increase and facilitate the accessibility to digital support systems.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCostsDigitizationEfficiencyObesity surgeryQualityWorkflow management system

Identifiers

PMID37867185
OpenAlexW4387856494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.