Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37866947›Full record

ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2023

[Deep Learning-Based Identification of Common Complication Features of Surgical Incisions].

Chunlin Zhao, Shiqi Hu, Tingting He, Linyan Yuan, Xue Yang, Jing Wang, Xiao Chen, Zhimin Liang, Yuchen Guo, Ping Li and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunlin ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shiqi HuCollege of Electronic Information (Computer Technology), Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China.
Tingting HeWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Linyan YuanWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xue YangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jing WangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xiao ChenWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhimin LiangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yuchen GuoWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Ping LiCollege of Electronic Information (Computer Technology), Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China.
Lingli LiWest China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, due to the development of accelerated recovery after surgery and day surgery in the field of surgery, the average length-of-stay of patients has been shortened and patients stay at home for post-surgical recovery and healing of the surgical incisions. In order to identify, in a timely manner, the problems that may appear at the incision site and help patients prevent or reduce the anxiety they may experience after discharge, we used deep learning method in this study to classify the features of common complications of surgical incisions, hoping to realize patient-directed early identification of complications common to surgical incisions. Methods: A total of 1 224 postoperative photographs of patients' surgical incisions were taken and collected at a tertiary-care hospital between June 2021 and March 2022. The photographs were collated and categorized according to different features of complications of the surgical incisions. Then, the photographs were divided into training, validation, and test sets at the ratio of 8∶1∶1 and 4 types of convolutional neural networks were applied in the training and testing of the models. Results: Through the training of multiple convolutional neural networks and the testing of the model performance on the basis of a test set of 300 surgical incision images, the average accuracy of the four ResNet classification network models, SE-ResNet101, ResNet50, ResNet101, and SE-ResNet50, for surgical incision classification was 0.941, 0.903, 0.896, and 0.918, respectively, the precision was 0.939, 0.898, 0.868, and 0.903, respectively, and the recall rate was 0.930, 0.880, 0.850, and 0.894, respectively, with the SE-Resnet101 network model showing the highest average accuracy of 0.941 for incision feature classification. Conclusion: Through the combined use of deep learning technology and images of surgical incisions, problematic features of surgical incisions can be effectively identified by examining surgical incision images. It is expected that patients will eventually be able to perform self-examination of surgical incisions on smart terminals.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSurgical WoundAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansPostoperative PeriodComplicationsDeep learningImage classificationSurgical incisions

Identifiers

PMID37866947
PMCPMC10579068
OpenAlexW4387866140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.