Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37866693›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology2023

Net effects explains the benefits to children from maternal fish consumption despite methylmercury in fish.

Philip Spiller, Edwin van Wijngaarden, Heather R Adams, J J Strain, Emeir M McSorley, Maria S Mulhern, Marie C Conway, Allison J Yeates, Clark Carrington, P Michael Bolger and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip SpillerCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration (retired), College Park, MD 20740, USA. Electronic address: pspiller@verizon.net.
Edwin van WijngaardenSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Heather R AdamsSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
J J StrainNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
Emeir M McSorleyNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
Maria S MulhernNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
Marie C ConwayNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
Allison J YeatesNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
Clark CarringtonCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration (retired), College Park, MD 20740, USA.
P Michael BolgerCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration (retired), College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Kara M MorganCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration (retired), College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Caroline M TaylorCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Nicholas V C RalstonEarth System Science and Policy, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Michael A CrawfordDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction. Imperial College, London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Room H 3, 34, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
Joseph R HibbelnSection on Nutritional Neurosciences, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health (retired), Rockville, MD, USA.
J Thomas BrennaDell Pediatric Research Institute, University of Texas at Austin, 1400 Barbara Jordan Blvd, Austin, TX 78723, USA.
Gary J MyersSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
University of Ulster · GBUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

Leveraging Investments in the Seychelles Child Development Study to Enable Novel Investigations of Long-Term MeHg Exposure, Toxicity Mechanisms, and Health across the Life CourseR24ES029466 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VAN WIJNGAARDEN, EDWIN · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Medical Research Council MR/T010010/1NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES029466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2001 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued precautionary advice to pregnant women to limit fish consumption over concern that the methylmercury content might harm their children's neurodevelopment. This concern was based largely on results from an epidemiological study of mothers primarily exposed to methylmercury from consuming pilot whale. Subsequently, FDA and the World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization (WHO/FAO) undertook independent assessments of fish consumption that considered net effects from both fish nutrients, primarily omega-3 fatty acids, as beneficial and methylmercury as harmful. Both assessments estimated that when mothers regularly consume fish during pregnancy, their children are likely to have improved neurodevelopment compared to children of non-fish eaters despite their exposure to methylmercury. These estimated improvements included gains of two to over five full scale IQ points from levels of maternal consumption that are achievable in most of the world. Consistent with those estimates, human research on fish consumption and child neurodevelopment from more than 200,000 mother-child pairs now collectively reports 51 beneficial associations with neurodevelopmental outcomes and three adverse associations, the latter with no discernable pattern. These associations include full scale IQ gains similar to, or somewhat higher than, those estimated by FDA and FAO/WHO. Also consistent with the FDA and FAO/WHO estimates, research has reported beneficial associations with fish consumption when pregnant women are exposed to methylmercury from fish in excess of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Reference Dose (RfD). Our analysis evaluates how the net effects approach as utilized by FDA and FAO/WHO provides a holistic explanation for these results with implications for public health policy. This concordance of net effects modeling and empirical scientific evidence supports a clarification of current public health recommendations to focus on greater fish consumption by pregnant women for their children's neurodevelopment.

Indexed as

Fatty Acids, Omega-3Methylmercury CompoundsAnimalsFemaleFishesFood ContaminationHumansMothersPregnancySeafoodFatty Acids, Omega-3Methylmercury CompoundsFishMethylmercuryNet effectsNeurodevelopmentOmega-3Pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37866693
PMCPMC11800581
OpenAlexW4387807428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.