ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
Predictions of thumb, hand, and arm muscle parameters derived using force measurements of varying complexity and neural networks.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-AI Cooperation in Healthcare and Rehabilitation.Delaware journal of public health · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Neural Network Personalized Musculoskeletal Hand Models Against Current Personalization Standards Using Experimental Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fine-Wire Electromyography.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Surrogate Simulation of Subject-Specific Lateral Pinch via Deep Learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subject-specific musculoskeletal models are a promising avenue for personalized healthcare. However, current methods for producing personalized models require dense, biomechanical datasets that include expensive and time-consuming physiological measurements. For personalized models to be clinically useful, we must be able to rapidly generate models from simple, easy to collect data. In this context, the objective of this paper is to evaluate if and how simple data, namely height/weight and pinch force data, can be used to achieve model personalization via machine learning. Using simulated lateral pinch force measurements from a synthetic population of 40,000 randomly generated subjects, we train neural networks to estimate four Hill-type muscle model parameters and bone density. We compare parameter estimates to the true parameters of 10,000 additional synthetic subjects. We also generate new personalized models using the parameter estimates and perform new lateral pinch simulations to compare predicted forces using these personalized models to those generated using a baseline model. We demonstrate that increasing force measurement complexity reduces the root-mean-square error in the majority of parameter estimates. Additionally, musculoskeletal models using neural network-based parameter estimates provide up to an 80% reduction in absolute error in simulated forces when compared to a generic model. Thus, easily obtained force measurements may be suitable for personalizing models of the thumb, although extending the method to more tasks and models involving other joints likely requires additional measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.