ArticleCell journal2023
Characterization of CAR T Cells Manufactured Using Genetically Engineered Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells.
Article in Cell journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspective of usingFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has recently emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of different types of cancer. Improving CAR T cell manufacturing in terms of costs and product quality is an important concern for expanding the accessibility of this therapy. One proposed strategy for improving T cell expansion is to use genetically engineered artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPC) expressing a membrane-bound anti-CD3 for T cell activation. The aim of this study was to characterize CAR T cells generated using this aAPC-mediated approach in terms of expansion efficiency, immunophenotype, and cytotoxicity. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this experimental study, we generated an aAPC line by engineering K562 cells to express a membrane-bound anti-CD3 (mOKT3). T cell activation was performed by co-culturing PBMCs with either mitomycin C-treated aAPCs or surface-immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. Untransduced and CD19-CARtransduced T cells were characterized in terms of expansion, activation markers, interferon gamma (IFN-γ) secretion, CD4/CD8 ratio, memory phenotype, and exhaustion markers. Cytotoxicity of CD19-CAR T cells generated by aAPCs and antibodies were also investigated using a bioluminescence-based co-culture assay.
resultsOur findings showed that the engineered aAPC line has the potential to expand CAR T cells similar to that using the antibody-based method. Although activation with aAPCs leads to a higher ratio of CD8+ and effector memory T cells in the final product, we did not observe a significant difference in IFN-γ secretion, cytotoxic activity or exhaustion between CAR T cells generated with aAPC or antibodies.
conclusionOur results show that despite the differences in the immunophenotypes of aAPC and antibody-based CAR T cells, both methods can be used to manufacture potent CAR T cells. These findings are instrumental for the improvement of the CAR T cell manufacturing process and future applications of aAPC-mediated expansion of CAR T cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.