Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865760›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Creating the ICU of the future: patient-centred design to optimise recovery.

Oystein Tronstad, Dylan Flaws, Sue Patterson, Robert Holdsworth, John F Fraser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Family: A Concept Analysis.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sleep in the ICU - A complex challenge requiring multifactorial solutions.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oystein TronstadCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia. oystein.tronstad@health.qld.gov.au.
Dylan FlawsCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Sue PattersonCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Robert HoldsworthCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Prince Charles Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive Care survival continues to improve, and the number of ICU services is increasing globally. However, there is a growing awareness of the detrimental impact of the ICU environment on patients, families, and staff. Excessive noise and suboptimal lighting especially have been shown to adversely impact physical and mental recovery during and after an ICU admission. Current ICU designs have not kept up with advances in medical technology and models of care, and there is no current 'gold-standard' ICU design. Improvements in ICU designs are needed to optimise care delivery and patient outcomes.

methodsThis manuscript describes a mixed-methods, multi-staged participatory design project aimed at redesigning and implementing two innovative ICU bedspaces. Guided by the action effect method and the consolidated framework for implementation research, the manuscript describes the processes taken to ensure the patient-centred problems were properly understood, the steps taken to develop and integrate solutions to identified problems, and the process of implementation planning and rebuilding in a live ICU.

resultsTwo innovative ICU bedspaces were rebuilt and implemented. They feature solutions to address all identified problems, including noise reduction, optimisation of lighting, access to nature via digital solutions, and patient connectivity and engagement, with solutions developed from various specialty fields, including IT improvements, technological innovations, and design and architectural solutions. Early evaluation demonstrates an improved lighting and acoustic environment.

conclusionsOptimising the ICU bedspace environment and improving the lighting and acoustic environment is possible. The impact on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsHospitalizationHumansNoisePatientsAcousticsEnvironmentICULightNoiseRedesignTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37865760
PMCPMC10589962
OpenAlexW4387845838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.