Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparison the effect of gelatin sponge and epinephrine-soaked gauze for hemostasis and pain control after hemorrhoidal surgery.

Kun-Min Tsai, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Yu-Chun Yen, Ka-Wai Tam, Tung-Cheng Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun-Min TsaiDepartment of General Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 901, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, Tainan City, New Taipei City, 71004, Taiwan.
Kee-Thai KiuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Number 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan.
Min-Hsuan YenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Number 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun YenBiostatistics Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, No. 172-1, Sec. 2, Keelung Road, Taipei City 106, Taiwan.
Ka-Wai TamDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital, Number 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan.
Tung-Cheng ChangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Number 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan. rotring810@yahoo.com.tw.
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-operative pain and bleeding are the main complications following hemorrhoidal surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether an absorbable gelatin sponge is a superior hemostatic and analgesic agent compared to gauze soaked in epinephrine for post-hemorrhoidal surgery care. A retrospective study was conducted using data from a single institute. Data were collected from the electronic medical record database and outpatient patient questionnaire archive. The study encompassed 143 patients who received gauze soaked in epinephrine as the hemostatic agent after hemorrhoidal surgery and 148 patients who received an absorbable gelatin sponge. Most patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy, with 119 (83.2%) in epinephrine group and 118 (79.7%) in gelatin sponge group. The primary outcome measurements were postoperative pain score, oral analgesic dosage and complications. Patients in the absorbable gelatin sponge group reported significantly lower pain scores from 8 h after their hemorrhoidal surgery (postoperative day 0) through postoperative day 2. The average pain scores in the absorbable gelatin sponge group and gauze soaked in epinephrine group were 5.3 ± 3.2 and 6.2 ± 3.2 (p = 0.03) on postoperative 8 h; 4.7 ± 3.0 and 5.8 ± 2.9 (p ≤ 0.01) on postoperative day one; and 4.4 ± 2.8 and 5.3 ± 2.9 (p = 0.01) on postoperative day two, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative recovery or complication rates between the two groups. Our study revealed that absorbable gelatin sponges provide more effective pain relief to patients during the initial postoperative days after hemorrhoidal surgery, without any adverse impact on patient outcomes. Consequently, absorbable gelatin sponges are recommended as a replacement for gauze soaked in epinephrine following hemorrhoidal surgery.

Indexed as

GelatinHemostaticsAnalgesicsHemostasisHumansPostoperative PainRetrospective StudiesAnalgesicsGelatinHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID37865694
PMCPMC10590443
OpenAlexW4387845644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.