Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865691›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Ruminal and feces metabolites associated with feed efficiency, water intake and methane emission in Nelore bulls.

Jessica Moraes Malheiros, Banny Silva Barbosa Correia, Caroline Ceribeli, Jennifer Jessica Bruscadin, Wellison J S Diniz, Priyanka Banerjee, Dielson da Silva Vieira, Tainã Figueiredo Cardoso, Bruno Gabriel Nascimento Andrade, Juliana Petrini and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jessica Moraes MalheirosEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Banny Silva Barbosa CorreiaInstitute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo/USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caroline CeribeliInstitute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo/USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer Jessica BruscadinEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellison J S DinizDepartament of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Priyanka BanerjeeDepartament of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Dielson da Silva VieiraEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tainã Figueiredo CardosoEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Gabriel Nascimento AndradeEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana PetriniDepartment of Animal Science, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Rodrigues CardosoInstitute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo/USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Alberto ColnagoEmbrapa Instrumentation, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stanislau Bogusz JuniorInstitute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo/USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gerson Barreto MourãoDepartment of Animal Science, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Lehmann CoutinhoDepartment of Animal Science, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Julio Cesar Pascale PalharesEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sergio Raposo de MedeirosEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre BerndtEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Correia de Almeida RegitanoEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. luciana.regitano@embrapa.br.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRAuburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were twofold: (1) to identify potential differences in the ruminal and fecal metabolite profiles of Nelore bulls under different nutritional interventions; and (2) to identify metabolites associated with cattle sustainability related-traits. We used different nutritional interventions in the feedlot: conventional (Conv; n = 26), and by-product (ByPr, n = 26). Thirty-eight ruminal fluid and 27 fecal metabolites were significantly different (P < 0.05) between the ByPr and Conv groups. Individual dry matter intake (DMI), residual feed intake (RFI), observed water intake (OWI), predicted water intake (WI), and residual water intake (RWI) phenotypes were lower (P < 0.05) in the Conv group, while the ByPr group exhibited lower methane emission (ME) (P < 0.05). Ruminal fluid dimethylamine was significantly associated (P < 0.05) with DMI, RFI, FE (feed efficiency), OWI and WI. Aspartate was associated (P < 0.05) with DMI, RFI, FE and WI. Fecal C22:1n9 was significantly associated with OWI and RWI (P < 0.05). Fatty acid C14:0 and hypoxanthine were significantly associated with DMI and RFI (P < 0.05). The results demonstrated that different nutritional interventions alter ruminal and fecal metabolites and provided new insights into the relationship of these metabolites with feed efficiency and water intake traits in Nelore bulls.

Indexed as

DrinkingFeeding BehaviorAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleDietEatingFecesMaleMethaneMethane

Identifiers

PMID37865691
PMCPMC10590413
OpenAlexW4387845879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.