Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865620›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2023

The MultiFurcating Neighbor-Joining Algorithm for Reconstructing Polytomic Phylogenetic Trees.

Alberto Fernández, Natàlia Segura-Alabart, Francesc Serratosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alberto FernándezDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. alberto.fernandez@urv.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-1646
Natàlia Segura-AlabartDepartament d'Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-2049
Francesc SerratosaDepartament d'Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-5913

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2021SGR-00111Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-124139NB-C22Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TED2021-129851B-I00Universitat Rovira i Virgili 2020PMF-PIPF- 45Universitat Rovira i Virgili 2021PFR-URV-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from phylogenetic analyses that study the evolution of species according to their biological characteristics are frequently structured as phylogenetic trees. One of the most widely used methods for reconstructing them is the distance-based method known as the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm. It is known that the NJ algorithm can produce different phylogenetic trees depending on the order of the taxa in the input matrix of evolutionary distances, because the method only yields bifurcating branches or dichotomies. According to this, results and conclusions published in articles that only calculate one of the possible dichotomic phylogenetic trees are somehow biased. We have generalized the formulas used in the NJ algorithm to cope with Multifurcating branches or polytomies, and we have called this new variant of the method the multifurcating neighbor-joining (MFNJ) algorithm. Instead of the dichotomic phylogenetic trees reconstructed by the NJ algorithm, the MFNJ algorithm produces polytomic phylogenetic trees. The main advantage of using the MFNJ algorithm is that only one phylogenetic tree can be obtained, which makes the experimental section of any study completely reproducible and unbiased to external issues such as the input order of taxa.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticPhylogenyDistance-based methodsNeighbor-joiningPolytomyTies in proximity

Identifiers

PMID37865620
PMCPMC10730667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.