Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865619›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Hoarding titmice predominantly use Familiarity, and not Recollection, when remembering cache locations.

Tom V Smulders, Laura J Douglas, Daniel Reza, Lucinda H Male, Alexander Prysce, Amélie Alix, Alexander de Guzman Dodd, Jenny C A Read

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom V SmuldersCentre for Behaviour & Evolution and Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. tom.smulders@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6673-7596
Laura J DouglasCentre for Behaviour & Evolution and Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1113-3290
Daniel RezaSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK.
Lucinda H MaleCentre for Behaviour & Evolution and Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Alexander PrysceSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK.
Amélie AlixCentre for Behaviour & Evolution and Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Alexander de Guzman DoddSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK.
Jenny C A ReadCentre for Behaviour & Evolution and Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-5185
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle College · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 10391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scatter-hoarding birds find their caches using spatial memory and have an enlarged hippocampus. Finding a cache site could be achieved using either Recollection (a discrete recalling of previously experienced information) or Familiarity (a feeling of "having encountered something before"). In humans, these two processes can be distinguished using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curves for olfactory memory in rats have shown the hippocampus is involved in Recollection, but not Familiarity. We test the hypothesis that food-hoarding birds, having a larger hippocampus, primarily use Recollection to find their caches. We validate a novel method of constructing ROC curves in humans and apply this method to cache retrieval by coal tits (Periparus ater). Both humans and birds mainly use Familiarity in finding their caches, with lower contribution of Recollection. This contribution is not significantly different from chance in birds, but a small contribution cannot be ruled out. Memory performance decreases with increasing retention interval in birds. The ecology of food-hoarding Parids makes it plausible that they mainly use Familiarity in the memory for caches. The larger hippocampus could be related to associating cache contents and temporal context with cache locations, rather than Recollection of the spatial information itself.

Indexed as

HoardingPasseriformesSongbirdsAnimalsFeeding BehaviorMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyCognitive evolutionComparative cognitionEpisodic-like memoryHippocampusPeriparus aterScatter-hoarding

Identifiers

PMID37865619
PMCPMC10769918
OpenAlexW4387843554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.