Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37865396›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

Pretreatment radiomic biomarker for immunotherapy responder prediction in stage IB-IV NSCLC (LCDigital-IO Study): a multicenter retrospective study.

Shaowei Wu, Weijie Zhan, Lan Liu, Daipeng Xie, Lintong Yao, Henian Yao, Guoqing Liao, Luyu Huang, Yubo Zhou, Peimeng You and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Timing matters: how mechanism-guided sequencing shapes the efficacy of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations : A systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Shaowei WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0265-9787
Weijie ZhanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Daipeng XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lintong YaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Henian YaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guoqing LiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Luyu HuangDepartment of Surgery, Competence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Yubo ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Peimeng YouDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Zekai HuangGuangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Qiaxuan LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Bin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Siyun WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangyi WangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Kun ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guibin QiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lawrence Wing-Chi ChanDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Michael LanutiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Haiyu ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China zhouhaiyu@gdph.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-6792
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNShantou University · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNJiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe predictive efficacy of current biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not sufficient. This study investigated the causality between radiomic biomarkers and immunotherapy response status in patients with stage IB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including its biological context for ICIs treatment response prediction.

methodsCT images from 319 patients with pretreatment NSCLC receiving immunotherapy between January 2015 and November 2021 were retrospectively collected and composed a discovery (n=214), independent validation (n=54), and external test cohort (n=51). A set of 851 features was extracted from tumorous and peritumoral volumes of interest (VOIs). The reference standard is the durable clinical benefit (DCB, sustained disease control for more than 6 months assessed via radiological evaluation). The predictive value of combined radiomic signature (CRS) for pathological response was subsequently assessed in another cohort of 98 patients with resectable NSCLC receiving ICIs preoperatively. The association between radiomic features and tumor immune landscape on the online data set (n=60) was also examined. A model combining clinical predictor and radiomic signatures was constructed to improve performance further.

resultsCRS discriminated DCB and non-DCB patients well in the training and validation cohorts with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.88, and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.87, respectively. In this study, the predictive value of CRS was better than programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (AUC of PD-L1 subset: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.69) or clinical model (AUC: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.81). After combining the clinical signature with CRS, the predictive performance improved further with an AUC of 0.837, 0.790 and 0.781 in training, validation and D2 cohorts, respectively. When predicting pathological response, CRS divided patients into a major pathological response (MPR) and non-MPR group (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.81). Moreover, CRS showed a promising stratification ability on overall survival (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.89; p=0.020) and progression-free survival (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.74; p=0.002).

conclusionBy analyzing both tumorous and peritumoral regions of CT images in a radiomic strategy, we developed a non-invasive biomarker for distinguishing responders of ICIs therapy and stratifying their survival outcome efficiently, which may support the clinical decisions on the use of ICIs in advanced as well as patients with resectable NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunotherapyRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, Tumorimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancertumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37865396
PMCPMC10603353
OpenAlexW4387850010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.