Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864722›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2023

Mechanisms of landiolol-mediated positive inotropy in critical care settings.

Athanasios Chalkias, E Paul O'Donnell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Landiolol is effective and safe in paediatric supraventricular tachycardia: evidence from a European prospective multicentre open-label phase III study (LANDI-PED).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of Landiolol for Treatment of Sepsis-Related Tachyarrhythmia: Lost in Translation.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Athanasios ChalkiasInstitute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5158, USA. thanoschalkias@yahoo.gr.
E Paul O'DonnellDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, 60515, USA.
Midwestern University · USOutcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present the potential mechanisms by which landiolol enhances a positive inotropic response in critically ill patients.

methodsAnalysis of preclinical, animal, and clinical data to provide novel knowledge and translate research findings into potential clinical application.

resultsThe super-selective β1-antagonist landiolol may increase inotropy and may be associated with positive outcomes in critically ill patients with acute decompensated heart failure or sepsis.

conclusionThis review sheds light on the potential mechanisms by which landiolol enhances a positive inotropic response, potentially alleviating the long-held concern over possible negative hemodynamic effects in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsHeart FailureAnimalsCritical CareCritical IllnessHeart RateHumansMorpholinesUreaAdrenergic beta-AntagonistslandiololMorpholinesUreaBeta-blockerCardiovascular dynamicsCritical careHemodynamicsLandiolol

Identifiers

PMID37864722
OpenAlexW4387845948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.