Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864717›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2024

Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review.

Daniel Ontaneda, Tanuja Chitnis, Kottil Rammohan, Ahmed Z Obeidat

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Refining predictors of long-term NEDA-3 status in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: insights from real-world data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel OntanedaMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ontaned@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-9148
Tanuja ChitnisBrigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kottil RammohanDivision of Multiple Sclerosis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ahmed Z ObeidatDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEarly treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in preventing irreversible neurological damage and disability progression. The current assessment of disease activity relies on relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, but inclusion of other early, often "hidden," indicators of disease activity may describe a more comprehensive picture of MS. OBSERVATIONS: Early indicators of MS disease activity other than relapses and MRI activity, such as cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and fatigue, are not typically captured by routine disease monitoring. Furthermore, silent progression (neurological decline not clearly captured by standard methods) may occur undetected by relapse and MRI lesion activity monitoring. Consequently, patients considered to have no disease activity actually may have worsening disease, suggesting a need to revise MS management strategies with respect to timely initiation and escalation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Traditionally, first-line MS treatment starts with low- or moderate-efficacy therapies, before escalating to high-efficacy therapies (HETs) after evidence of breakthrough disease activity. However, multiple observational studies have shown that early initiation of HETs can prevent or reduce disability progression. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are comparing escalation and early HET approaches. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is an urgent need to reassess how MS disease activity and worsening are measured. A greater awareness of "hidden" indicators, potentially combined with biomarkers to reveal silent disease activity and neurodegeneration underlying MS, would provide a more complete picture of MS and allow for timely therapeutic intervention with HET or switching DMTs to address suboptimal treatment responses.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingCognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRecurrenceBiomarkersCognitionDisease activityFatigueHigh-efficacy therapyMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID37864717
PMCPMC10972995
OpenAlexW4387845298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.