Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864532›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2023

A randomized controlled trial of recovery management checkups for primary care patients: Twelve-month results.

Christy K Scott, Michael L Dennis, Christine E Grella, Dennis P Watson, Jordan P Davis, M Kate Hart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christy K ScottChestnut Health Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael L DennisChestnut Health Systems, Normal, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5345
Christine E GrellaChestnut Health Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dennis P WatsonChestnut Health Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jordan P DavisSuzanne Dworak-Peck, School of Social Work, USC Center for Artificial Intelligence in Society, USC Center for Mindfulness Science, USC Institute for Addiction Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-4936
M Kate HartChestnut Health Systems, Normal, Illinois, USA.
Chestnut Health Systems · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care (RMC-PC): Replication and Sustainability within FQHC PracticeR01AA024440 · NIAAA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI Dennis Paul Watson · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA024440NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care settings like federally qualified health centers (FQHC) are optimal locations to identify individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and link them to SUD treatment, yet successful linkage has proven difficult. Recovery management checkups for primary care (RMC-PC) is a promising method for increasing linkage to care, engagement in treatment, and reducing substance use.

methodsParticipants (n = 266) who received screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) at four FQHC sites and needed SUD treatment were randomized to receive SBIRT only or SBIRT+RMC-PC. All participants received SBIRT prior to randomization as part of usual care while those in the experimental group also received quarterly checkups. All participants completed research interviews at enrollment and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-enrollment. The primary outcome was whether participants received any days of SUD treatment. Key secondary outcomes were days of SUD treatment (total and by SUD level of care), days of alcohol or drug abstinence, and a reduction in days of specific substance use, all based on self-report.

resultsRelative to participants receiving SBIRT only, participants assigned to SBIRT+RMC-PC were significantly more likely to have received any SUD treatment over 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.85) and more days of SUD treatment over 12 months (Cohen's effect size d = +0.41). The SBIRT+RMC-PC group also reported significantly more days of abstinence over 12 months (d = +0.30), fewer days of alcohol use (d = -0.20) and cannabis use (d = -0.20), and lower combined substance use frequency (d = -0.25). Days of treatment were found to positively mediate the direct effect of SBIRT+RMC-PC on days of abstinence.

conclusionThis study provides further evidence of the effectiveness of the "referral to treatment" component of SBIRT when combined with RMC for patients in primary care settings, including those with drug use problems. Moreover, results demonstrate the value of repeated checkups on longer-term treatment and substance use outcomes.

Indexed as

federally qualified health centers (FQHC)primary carerecovery management checkups (RMC)screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT)substance use disorders (SUD)

Identifiers

PMID37864532
PMCPMC10605959
OpenAlexW4387707115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.