Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864515›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

In vitro susceptibility patterns for slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria in the USA from 2018 to 2022.

Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura, Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Joshua J Hunkins, Charles L Daley, Reeti Khare

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of tetracyclines for nontuberculous mycobacteria: focus on rapidly growing mycobacteria.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Macrolide-resistantJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vinicius Calado Nogueira de MouraDivision of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Minh-Vu H NguyenDivision of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7598-7362
Joshua J HunkinsDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Charles L DaleyDivision of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Reeti KhareAdvanced Diagnostics Laboratories, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
National Jewish Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (SGM) is challenging. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is needed to optimize a multidrug regimen but requires weeks to result. Aggregated AST patterns, or an antibiogram, of SGM would be helpful to providers.

objectivesWe aggregated and analysed human SGM isolates sent to our laboratory from across the USA between 2018 and 2022 to describe their in vitro susceptibility patterns and construct an antibiogram.

methodsSGM isolates' species/subspecies and mutations in rrs or rrl were identified by a line probe assay. AST was done primarily by broth microdilution and interpreted using the latest CLSI guideline. Mutational and AST results for SGM with ≥15 isolates were collated and analysed with descriptive statistics.

resultsThere were 32 different species/subspecies of SGM from 10 131 isolates between January 2018 and December 2022 from across the USA, 80% of which were from organisms in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Most specimens were sputum and came from Florida (2892). MAC ranged from 94% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 64% to 91% to amikacin, 2% to 31% to linezolid, and 4% to 41% to moxifloxacin. Non-MAC SGM ranged from 82% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 49% to 100% to amikacin, and 76% to 100% to rifabutin, but susceptibilities to other antimicrobials varied widely. WT rrs and rrl predicted >96% of phenotypic non-resistance to amikacin and clarithromycin, respectively, whereas mutant genotypes predicted >90% of phenotypic resistance.

conclusionsMost SGM are likely to be susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin, complementing their treatment guidance by mycobacterial experts. Molecular identification of resistant genotypes is accurate and helpful. This antibiogram for SGM will help providers.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousNontuberculous MycobacteriaAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium avium ComplexAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycin

Identifiers

PMID37864515
PMCPMC10689928
OpenAlexW4387840484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.