Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864433›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

The impact of IdeS (imlifidase) on allo-specific, xeno-reactive, and protective antibodies in a sensitized rhesus macaque model.

Isabel DeLaura, Joanna Zikos, Imran J Anwar, Janghoon Yoon, Joseph Ladowski, Annette Jackson, Koen Van Rompay, Diogo Magnani, Stuart J Knechtle, Jean Kwun

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A novel immunoglobulin G- and immunoglobulin cleaving enzyme MG (IceMG), for antibody-mediated rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel DeLauraDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-0918
Joanna ZikosMassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Imran J AnwarDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-4148
Janghoon YoonDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-194X
Joseph LadowskiDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Annette JacksonDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Koen Van RompayCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Diogo MagnaniMassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stuart J KnechtleDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jean KwunDuke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8563-5472
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
The Risks and Opportunities of Homeostatic RepopulationU19AI131471 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Serghios Barbas · 2017 to 2026
$30.4M
Nonhuman Primate Reagent ResourceU24AI126683 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Diogo Magnani · 2016 to 2026
$20.1M
Resource for Nonhuman Primate Cell Depleting AntibodiesR24OD010976 · OD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ENGELMAN, KATHLEEN, MAGNANI, DIOGO · 2012 to 2019
$4.7M
Overcoming humoral rejection after xenotransplantation in sensitized nonhuman primate recipientsR01AI175411 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Jean Kwun · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Measuring the Impact of Allosensitization on XenotransplantationR21AI151398 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KNECHTLE, STUART JOHNSTON, KWUN, JEAN · 2020 to 2021
$443k
Structure Of Beta Amyloid FibrilsZ01OD011017 · OD · OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NIH · PI LEAPMAN, RICHARD D · 1999 to 2006
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 OD011017NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI175411NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI151398NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI131471NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI126683NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIH HHS R24 OD010976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHighly sensitized patients face many barriers to kidney transplantation, including higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection after HLA-incompatible transplant. IdeS, an endopeptidase that cleaves IgG nonspecifically, has been trialed as desensitization prior to kidney transplant, and successfully cleaves donor-specific antibody (DSA), albeit with rebound.

methodsIdeS was generated and tested (2 mg/kg, IV) in two naïve and four allosensitized nonhuman primates (NHP). Peripheral blood samples were collected at regular intervals following IdeS administration. Total IgG, total IgM, and anti-CMV antibodies were quantified with ELISA, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) and anti-pig antibodies were evaluated using flow cytometric crossmatch. B cell populations were assessed using flow cytometry.

resultsIdeS successfully cleaved rhesus IgG in vitro. In allosensitized NHP, robust reduction of total, DSA, anti-pig, and anti-CMV IgG was observed within one day following IdeS administration. Rapid rebound of all IgG antibody populations was observed, with antibody levels returning to baseline around day 14 post-infusion. Total IgM level was not affected by IdeS. Interestingly, a comparable reduction in antibody populations was observed after the second dose of IdeS. However, we have not observed any significant modulation of B cell subpopulations after IdeS.

conclusionsThis study evaluated efficacy of IdeS in the allosensitized NHP in IgG with various specificities, mirroring antibody kinetics in human patients. The efficacy of IdeS on preexisting anti-pig antibodies may be useful in clinical xenotransplantation. However, given the limitation of IdeS on its durability as a monotherapy, optimization of IdeS with other agents targeting the humoral response is further needed.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionIsoantibodiesAnimalsHLA AntigensHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MImmunosuppressive AgentsMacaca mulattaTransplantation, HeterologousHLA AntigensImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoantibodiesdesensitizationIdeSimmunoglobulin Grhesus macaquesensitization

Identifiers

PMID37864433
PMCPMC10999173
OpenAlexW4387840850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.