Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864295›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Generative models for protein sequence modeling: recent advances and future directions.

Mehrsa Mardikoraem, Zirui Wang, Nathaniel Pascual, Daniel Woldring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. ProT-GFDM: A generative fractional diffusion model for protein generation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehrsa MardikoraemMichigan State University (MSU)'s Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science.
Zirui WangRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Having received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from MSU, he is currently pursuing a M.S. in Computer Science from Syracuse University.
Nathaniel PascualB.S. in Chemical Engineering from MSU.
Daniel WoldringMSU's Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and a member of MSU's Institute for Quantitative Health Sciences and Engineering.

Funding

Rationally guided discovery platform for monoclonal antibodies against carbohydrate antigens using virus-like particle conjugate immunization and high throughput selectionR21AI174001 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDRING, DANIEL RAY · 2023 to 2024
$416k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI174001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of high-throughput omics technologies has exponentially increased the amount of protein sequence data involved in many salient disease pathways and their respective therapeutics and diagnostics. Despite the availability of large-scale sequence data, the lack of experimental fitness annotations underpins the need for self-supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) methods. These techniques leverage the meaningful features encoded in abundant unlabeled sequences to accomplish complex protein engineering tasks. Proficiency in the rapidly evolving fields of protein engineering and generative AI is required to realize the full potential of ML models as a tool for protein fitness landscape navigation. Here, we support this work by (i) providing an overview of the architecture and mathematical details of the most successful ML models applicable to sequence data (e.g. variational autoencoders, autoregressive models, generative adversarial neural networks, and diffusion models), (ii) guiding how to effectively implement these models on protein sequence data to predict fitness or generate high-fitness sequences and (iii) highlighting several successful studies that implement these techniques in protein engineering (from paratope regions and subcellular localization prediction to high-fitness sequences and protein design rules generation). By providing a comprehensive survey of model details, novel architecture developments, comparisons of model applications, and current challenges, this study intends to provide structured guidance and robust framework for delivering a prospective outlook in the ML-driven protein engineering field.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerUnsupervised Machine LearningAmino Acid SequenceExerciseProteinsProteinsdiffusion modelsgenerative adversarial neural networks (GANs)generative machine learning (ML) modelsnatural language processing (NLP)protein engineeringvariational autoencoders (VAE)

Identifiers

PMID37864295
PMCPMC10589401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.