Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864260›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2023

Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients.

Andrea Luigi Ambrosoli, Stefano Di Carlo, Andrea Crespi, Paolo Severgnini, Luisa Luciana Fedele, Vincenza Cofini, Stefano Necozione, Giuseppe Musella

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07661628 (Clinical Characteristics of Prilocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07661628 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Characteristics of Prilocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery: Clinical Profile and Efficacy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsHealthy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Luigi AmbrosoliAzienda Ospedaliera Di Varese: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy. andrealuigi.ambrosoli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4338-4932
Stefano Di CarloASL 4 Teramo: Azienda Sanitaria Locale 4 Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Andrea CrespiAzienda Ospedaliera Di Varese: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Paolo SevergniniUniversity of Insubria Faculty of Medicine and Surgery: Università Degli Studi Dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Luisa Luciana FedeleAzienda Ospedaliera Di Varese: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Vincenza CofiniUniversity of Aquila: Università Degli Studi Dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Stefano NecozioneUniversity of Aquila: Università Degli Studi Dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giuseppe MusellaAzienda Ospedaliera Di Varese: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine.The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects.All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed.Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491).Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported.Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom.Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2-14%).The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaOutpatient surgeryPerioperative complicationPrilocaineRetrospective studySpinal

Identifiers

PMID37864260
PMCPMC10589922
OpenAlexW4387812516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.