Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864128›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Robotic pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience.

Thibault Planchamp, Lucas Bento, Sofia Mouttalib, Ichrak Belbahri, Bernard Coustets, Dalinda Ait Aissa, Olivier Abbo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thibault PlanchampDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, H, pital Des Enfants, CHU Toulouse, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France. planchamp.t@chu-toulouse.fr.
Lucas BentoDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Rangueil, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sofia MouttalibDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, H, pital Des Enfants, CHU Toulouse, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Ichrak BelbahriDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, H, pital Des Enfants, CHU Toulouse, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Bernard CoustetsDepartment of Anesthesia, Hôpital des Enfants-CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Dalinda Ait AissaDepartment of Anesthesia, Hôpital des Enfants-CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Olivier AbboDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, H, pital Des Enfants, CHU Toulouse, 330, Avenue de Grande Bretagne - TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Hôpital des Enfants · FRHôpital Rangueil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic pyeloplasty has become a technique of choice for pyelo-ureteral junction syndrome treatment in children. Less invasive than open surgery, robotic pyeloplasty also has a lower learning curve than laparoscopic pyeloplasty. This is how a new generation of surgeons without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience has begun training in robotics. To assess the robotic assisted pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon only trained in open pyeloplasty, and to investigate if that mode of practice is safe and effective. Data were collected from all children operated on for pyelo-ureteral junction syndrome by the same surgeon in our center between 2015 and 2021. Cases were divided into 4 groups of 14 consecutive procedures to analyze the learning curve. Fifty-six patients were operated on, with a median (IQR) age, weight, and hospital stay of 9 years and 1 month old (3.5), 29 kg (17.3), and 3 days (2), respectively. The mean ± SD operative times were 146.5 ± 39.3, 123.2 ± 48.1, 103.1 ± 29.5, and 141.7 ± 25.0 min, with a unique significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.007**). Only two intraoperative and nine postoperative complications were observed. The surgery was successful in 98% cases. Our study shows that a significant improvement in surgical time could be achieved in the first 30 cases, safely and efficiently even without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience.Level of evidence: III.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsUreteral ObstructionChildHumansInfantKidney PelvisLearning CurveRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopic pyeloplastyLearning curvePediatricPyelo-ureteral junction syndromeRobotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Identifiers

PMID37864128
OpenAlexW4387804961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.