Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37863996›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Real-world outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy candidates with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study.

Hirokazu Kagawa, Fumihiko Urabe, Yuria Kiuchi, Kota Katsumi, Ryotaro Yamaguchi, Yushi Suhara, Kentaro Yoshihara, Yuma Goto, Ibuki Sadakane, Yuji Yata and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirokazu Kagawa *Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumihiko Urabe *Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. furabe0809@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-8183
Yuria KiuchiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota KatsumiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryotaro YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yushi SuharaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro YoshiharaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuma GotoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ibuki SadakaneDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji YataDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun SaitoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shiro KurawakiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shino AjisakaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichiro MiyajimaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakahashiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke IwataniDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu ImaiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo SakanakaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru NakazonoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KurauchiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sotaro KayanoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hajime OnumaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi AikawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kojiro TashiroDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke TsuzukiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira FurutaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
JIKEI-YAYOI Collaborative Group
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent clinical trials have reported improved disease-free survival rates of patients with stage pT3-4/ypT2-4 or pN + upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) on adjuvant nivolumab therapy. However, the appropriateness of the patient selection criteria used in clinical practice remains uncertain.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 895 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy to treat UTUC. The patients were divided into two groups: grade pT3-4 and/or pN + without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or grade ypT2-4 and/or ypN + on NAC (adjuvant immunotherapy candidates) and others (not candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy). Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to assess the oncological outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant prognostic factors for oncological outcomes.

resultsThe Kaplan-Meier curves revealed notably inferior RFS, CSS, and OS of patients who were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological T and N grade and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status were independent risk factors for poor RFS, CSS, and OS.

conclusionIn total, 44.8% of patients were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. In addition to pathological T and N status, LVI was a significant predictor of survival, and may thus play a pivotal role in the selection of patients eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNephroureterectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAdjuvant candidateNeoadjuvant chemotherapyUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37863996
OpenAlexW4387801071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.