ArticleScientific reports2023
A novel bidirectional LSTM deep learning approach for COVID-19 forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel soft sensor framework based on adaptive LSTM ensemble for robust water quality prediction in wastewater treatment plants.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Article
- A dynamic ensemble model for short-term forecasting in pandemic situations.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality globally. We develop a model that uses data from thirty days before a fixed time point to forecast the daily number of new COVID-19 cases fourteen days later in the early stages of the pandemic. Various time-dependent factors including the number of daily confirmed cases, reproduction number, policy measures, mobility and flight numbers were collected. A deep-learning model using Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) architecture was trained on data from 22nd Jan 2020 to 8 Jan 2021 to forecast the new daily number of COVID-19 cases 14 days in advance across 190 countries, from 9 to 31 Jan 2021. A second model with fewer variables but similar architecture was developed. Results were summarised by mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and total absolute percentage error and compared against results from a classical ARIMA model. Median MAE was 157 daily cases (IQR: 26-666) under the first model, and 150 (IQR: 26-716) under the second. Countries with more accurate forecasts had more daily cases and experienced more waves of COVID-19 infections. Among countries with over 10,000 cases over the prediction period, median total absolute percentage error was 33% (IQR: 18-59%) and 34% (IQR: 16-66%) for the first and second models respectively. Both models had comparable median total absolute percentage errors but lower maximum total absolute percentage errors as compared to the classical ARIMA model. A deep-learning approach using Bi-LSTM architecture and open-source data was validated on 190 countries to forecast the daily number of cases in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. Fewer variables could potentially be used without impacting prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.