Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37863506›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2023

Quality improvement initiative for a sustained increase in human milk donation during the hospital stay.

Suksham Jain, Akanksha Bansal, Supreet Khurana, Deepak Chawla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suksham JainNeonatology, GMCH, Chandigarh, Punjab, India dr.sukshamj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-2992
Akanksha BansalNeonatology, GMCH, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Supreet KhuranaNeonatology, GMCH, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Deepak ChawlaPediatrics, GMCH, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demand for donors' human milk is much more than the availability of the same due to the myriad challenges faced during the collection process.

methodsBaseline milk volume donation done in a human milk bank facility located in tertiary care government institute in a low-middle income country was assessed. It was initially aimed to increase the absolute quantity of milk volume donation by 30% over a period of 6 months, which was subsequently continued following COVID-19 emergence (over another 12 months) along with a particular emphasis on the sustenance of milk donation activities.

interventionsCounselling of both the healthcare workers and stakeholders, standardising the timing of milk donation and other policies, equipment in proportion to demand and supply and addition of human resource were done as a multiprong approach to have sustained increase in human milk donation.

resultsThe median control line (MCL) showed a shift of 27.8%; from a baseline of 5032 mL to 6971 mL during intervention phase I comprising of five plan do study act cycles spread over a period of 6 months. During the sustenance phase I even though the monthly collection was non-uniform, there was a further 16% upward shift in MCL to 8122 mL. During the second intervention phase, each component of the Ishikawa diagram was worked on (people, policy, place, procedure) resulting in a more than 100% increase from sustenance phase I taking the MCL to 17 181 mL with an overall increase of 3.41 times from the baseline.

conclusionDedicated counselling and constant motivation have been conventionally considered as the utmost measure to increase milk volume donation in milk bank. Our study highlights the need to introduce scheduled timings along with sufficient equipment and manpower to overcome the shortage of milk donation in human milk bank facilities.

Indexed as

Milk BanksMilk, HumanHumansLength of StayQuality ImprovementTissue Donorscontinuous quality improvementpaediatricsPDSA

Identifiers

PMID37863506
PMCPMC10603414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.