Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37863451›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2024

Donation after circulatory death significantly reduces waitlist times while not changing post-heart transplant outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Analysis.

Hosam F Ahmed, Kevin Kulshrestha, John T Kennedy, Amalia Gomez-Guzman, Jason W Greenberg, Md Monir Hossain, Yin Zhang, David A D'Alessandro, Ranjit John, Nader Moazami and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation of a controlled DCD program in Western Austria - key considerations and insights.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  8. Spanish Center's Early Experience With Donation Following Circulatory Death in Heart Transplantation.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support in heart failure.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Moderate controlled hypothermiaAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hosam F AhmedDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kevin KulshresthaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
John T KennedyDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Amalia Gomez-GuzmanDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jason W GreenbergDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Md Monir HossainDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Yin ZhangDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
David A D'AlessandroDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ranjit JohnDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nader MoazamiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, New York, New York.
Clifford ChinDivision of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Awais AshfaqDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Farhan ZafarDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
David L S MoralesDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: david.morales@cchmc.org.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Novel Methods to Grow the Impact of Pediatric Thoracic TransplantationR01HL147957 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI CHIN, CLIFFORD, MORALES, DAVID L · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL147957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, several centers in the United States have begun performing donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplants (HTs) in adults. We sought to characterize the recent use of DCD HT, waitlist time, and outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD).

methodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 10,402 adult (aged >18 years) HT recipients from January 2019 to June 2022 were identified: 425 (4%) were DCD and 9,977 (96%) were DBD recipients. Posttransplant outcomes in matched and unmatched cohorts and waitlist times were compared between groups.

resultsDCD and DBD recipients had similar age (57 years for both, p = 0.791). DCD recipients were more likely White (67% vs 60%, p = 0.002), on left ventricular assist device (LVAD; 40% vs 32%, p < 0.001), and listed as status 4 to 6 (60% vs 24%, p < 0.001); however, less likely to require inotropes (22% vs 40%, p < 0.001) and preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.9% vs 6%, p < 0.001). DCD donors were younger (29 vs 32 years, p < 0.001) and had less renal dysfunction (15% vs 39%, p < 0.001), diabetes (1.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.050), or hypertension (9.9% vs 16%, p = 0.001). In matched and unmatched cohorts, early survival was similar (p = 0.22). Adjusted waitlist time was shorter in DCD group (21 vs 31 days, p < 0.001) compared to DBD cohort and 5-fold shorter (DCD: 22 days vs DBD: 115 days, p < 0.001) for candidates in status 4 to 6, which was 60% of DCD cohort.

conclusionsThe community is using DCD mostly for those recipients who are expected to have extended waitlist times (e.g., durable LVADs, status >4). DCD recipients had similar posttransplant early survival and shorter adjusted waitlist time compared to DBD group. Given this early success, efforts should be made to expand the donor pool using DCD, especially for traditionally disadvantaged recipients on the waitlist.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultBrain DeathDeathGraft SurvivalHumansRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTissue DonorsDonation after circulatory deathHeart transplantOrgan donationPost-transplant survivalWaitlist time

Identifiers

PMID37863451
PMCPMC10922468
OpenAlexW4387747429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.