Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37863179›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2024

Persistent race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility.

Alexandra L Potter, Priyanka Senthil, Deepti Srinivasan, Vignesh Raman, Arvind Kumar, Chinmay Haridas, Camille Mathey-Andrews, Wei Zheng, Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Disparities in Screening: Can Education Address Imbalance?Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra L PotterDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Priyanka SenthilDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Deepti SrinivasanDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Vignesh RamanDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Arvind KumarDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Chinmay HaridasDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Camille Mathey-AndrewsDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Chi-Fu Jeffrey YangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: cjyang@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Ben Ho Park · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Southern Community Cohort StudyU01CA202979 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BLOT, WILLIAM J., SHRUBSOLE, MARTHA J. · 2016 to 2025
$22.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility under the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network lung cancer screening guidelines.

methodsParticipants in the Southern Community Cohort Study with a smoking history diagnosed with lung cancer from 2002 to 2021 were identified for analysis. Differences in age at lung cancer diagnosis and smoking characteristics were evaluated among 4 groups: Black men, Black women, White men, and White women.

resultsA total of 2011 patients with lung cancer met study inclusion criteria, of whom 968 (48.1%) were women and 1248 (62.1%) were Black. Under the 2013 guideline, Black men with lung cancer were significantly less likely to be eligible for screening when compared with White men with lung cancer (37.7% vs 62.4%; P < .001), and Black women with lung cancer were significantly less likely to be eligible for screening when compared with White women with lung cancer (27.8% vs 56.7%; P < .001). Under the 2021 guideline, 62.6% of Black and 73.8% of White men (P < .001) with lung cancer would have been eligible for screening, resulting in an 11.2 percentage point difference in screening eligibility between Black and White men. Under the 2021 guideline, 50.3% of Black and 74.9% of White (P < .001) women with lung cancer would have been eligible for screening; notably, there remained a 24.6 percentage point difference in screening eligibility between Black and White women. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, under the 2021 USPSTF guideline, Black men with lung cancer had 46% lower odds of being eligible for screening compared with White men with lung cancer (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76; P < .001) and Black women with lung cancer had 66% lower odds of being eligible for screening compared with White women with lung cancer (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.46; P < .001). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline increased the proportion of patients with lung cancer eligible for screening in each group.

conclusionsIn this analysis of patients with lung cancer in the Southern Community Cohort Study, there remained a large gap in lung cancer screening eligibility between Black and White men and women under the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force guideline. Only 50% of Black women and 63% of Black men diagnosed with lung cancer would have qualified for screening.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesLung NeoplasmsWhite PeopleAgedEligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokingUnited Statescancer screening eligibilitycomputed tomographydisparitiesearly detectionlung cancer screeningNCCNUSPSTF

Identifiers

PMID37863179
PMCPMC11698625
OpenAlexW4387747425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.