ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023
[Information on Death Certificates: Comparison Between Inpatient and Outpatient Sectors].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Piloting an electronic death certificate (eTB app)-physicians' user experiences].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The death of a person and the circumstances of death are documented on the death certificate in Germany. The path of the corpse to burial as well as the quality of the cause of death statistics are significantly influenced by the information in the official death certificate. The quality of the information in the death certificates has been repeatedly criticized. The aim of the present study was to identify typical sources of error in death certificates and to obtain information on whether qualitative differences exist between death certificates completed in the outpatient and inpatient sectors. A retrospective evaluation was performed of 218 death certificates of deaths examined by the Institute of Legal Medicine as part of a second postmortem examination prior to cremation. Of these, 118 death certificates were issued in the hospital and 100 death certificates were issued on an outpatient basis by the family physician or a physician on duty in the outpatient sector. All but one of the death certificates issued on an outpatient basis were legible. The information on the underlying disease was plausible. More than one-third of the epicrises had no significant findings or were not completed at all. The entry on the immediate causes of death in the designated field on the death certificate (Ia in the causal chain) were inadequate in one third of the cases. The error rate in the entries was higher in outpatient than in inpatient deaths. In the future, therefore, it will be necessary to prepare for the special situation of a post-mortem examination by means of further and advanced training events and to convey the importance of the diagnoses determined in the process, in order to eliminate these avoidable sources of error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.