ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023
Evolutionary Insights from a Large-Scale Survey of Population-Genomic Variation.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mutation landscape of Daphnia obtusa reveals evolutionary forces shaping genome stability.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Analysis of Gene-Expression Localization in the Model Crustacean, Daphnia pulex.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- The mutation landscape ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Opinion: Why Sex-Based Genomic Differentiation Should Not Be Overlooked in Population Genetics.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Analysis of Gene-expression Localization in the Model Crustacean,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The genome-wide signature of short-term temporal selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Copy number and sequence variation in rDNA of Daphnia pulex from natural populations: insights from whole-genome sequencing.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Evolutionary Genomics of Sister Species Differing in Effective Population Sizes and Recombination Rates.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The field of genomics has ushered in new methods for studying molecular-genetic variation in natural populations. However, most population-genomic studies still rely on small sample sizes (typically, <100 individuals) from single time points, leaving considerable uncertainties with respect to the behavior of relatively young (and rare) alleles and, owing to the large sampling variance of measures of variation, to the specific gene targets of unusually strong selection. Genomic sequences of ∼1,700 haplotypes distributed over a 10-year period from a natural population of the microcrustacean Daphnia pulex reveal evolutionary-genomic features at a refined scale, including previously hidden information on the behavior of rare alleles predicted by recent theory. Background selection, resulting from the recurrent introduction of deleterious alleles, appears to strongly influence the dynamics of neutral alleles, inducing indirect negative selection on rare variants and positive selection on common variants. Temporally fluctuating selection increases the persistence of nonsynonymous alleles with intermediate frequencies, while reducing standing levels of variation at linked silent sites. Combined with the results from an equally large metapopulation survey of the study species, classes of genes that are under strong positive selection can now be confidently identified in this key model organism. Most notable among rapidly evolving Daphnia genes are those associated with ribosomes, mitochondrial functions, sensory systems, and lifespan determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.