Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37862792›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2023

Intraluminal tumor cells and prognostic accuracy of endometrial cancer stage criteria: A multi-institution study.

Ashley S Felix, Jennifer A Sinnott, David E Cohn, Máire A Duggan, Laura J Havrilesky, Alexander B Olawaiye, Andrea Mariani, Monica Rodriquez, Mary Anne Brett, Giorgia Dinoi and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley S FelixDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: Ashley.Felix@osumc.edu.
Jennifer A SinnottDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University College of Arts and Sciences, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
David E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Máire A DugganDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Laura J HavrileskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Alexander B OlawaiyeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Women's Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Andrea MarianiGynecology and Obstetrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Monica RodriquezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mary Anne BrettDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Giorgia DinoiGynecology and Obstetrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Caitlin E MeadeDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Bobbie HallDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Ester GoldfeldDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Women's Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Esther ElishaevDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Women's Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Mark E ShermanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America.
Adrian A SuarezDivision of Pathology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
The Ohio State University · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USDuke Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Determining the clinical significance of intraluminal tumor cells in endometrial cancerR03CA230673 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FELIX, ASHLEY S. · 2019 to 2020
$156k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA230673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndometrial cancer stage is a strong prognostic factor; however, the current stage classification does not incorporate transtubal spread as determined by intraluminal tumor cells (ILTCs). We examined relationships between ILTCs and survival outcomes according to histological subtype and stage and examined whether identification of ILTCs improves prognostic accuracy of endometrial cancer staging.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer at five academic hospitals between 2007 and 2012. Pathologists determined ILTC presence (no vs. yes) and location (free in lumen vs. attached to epithelial surface) based on pathology review of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of fallopian tubes. Associations between ILTCs with time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were examined with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for other prognostic factors. Model discrimination metrics were used to assess the addition of ILTCs to stage for prediction of 5-year TTR and OS.

resultsIn the overall study population (N = 1303), ILTCs were not independently associated with TTR (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.69-1.32) or OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.72-1.31). Among 805 women with stage I disease, ILTCs were independently associated with worse TTR (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.06-5.05) and OS (HR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.14-4.11). Upstaging early-stage cases with ILTCs present did not increase model discrimination.

conclusionWhile our data do not suggest that endometrial cancer staging guidelines should be revised to include ILTCs, associations between ILTCs and reduced survival observed among stage I cases suggest this tumor feature holds clinical relevance for subgroups of endometrial cancer patients.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFallopian TubesFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDisease-specific mortalityFallopian tubePatterns of spreadUterus neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID37862792
PMCPMC10842547
OpenAlexW4387762871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.