ArticlePloS one2023
Information sharing in high-dimensional gene expression data for improved parameter estimation in concentration-response modelling.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In toxicological concentration-response studies, a frequent goal is the determination of an 'alert concentration', i.e. the lowest concentration where a notable change in the response in comparison to the control is observed. In high-throughput gene expression experiments, e.g. based on microarray or RNA-seq technology, concentration-response profiles can be measured for thousands of genes simultaneously. One approach for determining the alert concentration is given by fitting a parametric model to the data which allows interpolation between the tested concentrations. It is well known that the quality of a model fit improves with the number of measured data points. However, adding new replicates for existing concentrations or even several replicates for new concentrations is time-consuming and expensive. Here, we propose an empirical Bayes approach to information sharing across genes, where in essence a weighted mean of the individual estimate for one specific parameter of a fitted model and the mean of all estimates of the entire set of genes is calculated as a result. Results of a controlled plasmode simulation study show that for many genes a notable improvement in terms of the mean squared error (MSE) between estimate and true underlying value of the parameter can be observed. However, for some genes, the MSE increases, and this cannot be prevented by using a more sophisticated prior distribution in the Bayesian approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.